Before the evaluation, the trainee is informed of its type, weight, date, duration, attempts, minimum success rate, permitted resources, and correction criteria.

The assessment must measure stated knowledge or skill, and must not include a requirement that is not taught or stated. Clarity of language, reasonable time and deadlines are taken into account.

Proportionate verification may be requested, such as access to an account, a special code, or the presentation of a document, with unnecessary data hidden. Biometric data is collected only when there is a clear basis, independent information and appropriate safeguards.

If human or technical monitoring is used, announce before registration or an appropriate time before the test:

• type of monitoring;
• Data or recordings collected;
• Purpose and duration of retention;
• Who can see it?
• Technical requirements;
• The alternative available when a project is needed.

Only what is required for integrity is required. Do not interpret a single movement, sound, or change of location as cheating without reviewing the context.

If a malfunction occurs, the trainee takes as many pictures or notifications as possible and communicates immediately. Records are reviewed, and testing may be resumed, repeated, or extended without penalty if the defect is beyond its control.

The declared rule shall be applied taking into account the fault, the justifiable circumstance and the appropriate arrangement. Unpublished or disproportionate punishment is not acceptable.

The debugger supports a network or declared standards. Identity is separated from work whenever practical, and modifications affecting the point are documented.

The result is published within the announced deadline or a delay notice is sent. The trainee has the right to understand the scoring elements and obtain appropriate feedback without revealing protected answers that may harm the integrity of future assessments.

The number of attempts, the terms and fees for retakes, if any, are determined before registration or before the first attempt. No fees are charged for re-entry due to a malfunction from the academy or a corrected error.

Defines criteria, duration and evaluators. It may be recorded for review after notification, with access and retention restricted.

Processed according to POL-15 and POL-16. A similarity indicator or monitoring alert does not turn into a final penalty without human review and enabling the trainee to clarify.

The points are collected, entered, or attributed to another account immediately after verification, and the affected document is reissued without a fee if the error is from the academy.

It is submitted within the announced deadline, and explains the question, criterion, or error. The result will be reviewed by a qualified person who was not alone in making the first decision whenever possible, and it may remain, increase, or decrease if the re-correction is complete and announced in advance.

POL-17 applies, and may include additional time, alternative format, assistive technology, or accommodation, without reducing the substantive learning outcome.

Assessment papers, files and records shall be kept in accordance with POL-20 and the applicable internal control, with access restricted to the teacher, grader and authorized administration.

Do not change a valid result due to a financial delay. A non-essential service may be restricted within legitimate limits in accordance with POL-04 without withholding the right to complain or review the result.

Inquiries and reviews are submitted via the account or [email protected] according to POL-18.